Go back to main project page

Chiricahua Public Access #57856

Construct small sections of road to connect existing system roads to system roads that currently do not have public motorized access due to intervening private land. Four segments would be constructed in three different areas of the Chiricahua EMA.

Opportunity to Object to the Chiricahua Public Access Project

The Douglas Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest has prepared an environmental assessment, finding of no significant impact, and draft decision notice for the Chiricahua Public Access Project. The proposed action is to authorize construction of 2.7 miles of new National Forest System Roads (system roads) to provide legal, permanent, motorized, public access to existing system roads in John Long, North Fork of Pinery, and Horseshoe Canyons. The general location of the proposed project is the Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area in Cochise County, Arizona. The project would accomplish the purpose and need to restore and secure permanent, legal, public, motorized access to existing National Forest System Roads consistent with 2018 Coronado National Forest Plan objectives and management direction.

The environmental assessment, finding of no significant impact, and draft decision notice are available online at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57856. Questions should be directed to Joseph Harris, District Range and Watershed Staff, at (520) 388-8447 or joseph.e.harris@usda.gov.

The Chiricahua Public Access Project is an activity implementing a land management plan not authorized under the Healthy Forests Restoration Act and is subject to the objection process pursuant to 36 CFR 218 Subparts A and B.

How to file an Objection and Timeframe

Objections will only be accepted from those who have previously submitted specific written comments regarding the proposed action during scoping or other designated opportunity for public comment in accordance with 36 CFR 218.5(a). Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted, timely, and specific written comments regarding the proposed action unless based on new information arising after the designated comment opportunities.

Objections, including attachments, must be submitted to the reviewing officer: Kurt Davis, Deputy Forest Supervisor, 300 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701. Objections may be submitted via mail or electronically. Electronic objections, in common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats, may be submitted to: objections-southwestern-coronado@usda.gov with subject: “OBJECTION: Chiricahua Public Access Project” or may be submitted using the Public Comment Form at https://cara.fs2c.usda.gov/Public//CommentInput?Project=57856.

Objections must be submitted within 45 days following the publication of this legal notice in the Herald/Review County Edition newspaper. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the time to file an objection. Those wishing to object should not rely upon dates or timeframe information provided by any other source. Regulations prohibit extending the time to file an objection.

At a minimum, an objection must include the following (36 CFR 218.8(d)):

  1. Objector’s name and address as defined in 218.2, with a telephone number, if available;
  2. Signature or other verification of authorship upon request (a scanned signature for electronic mail may be filed with the objection);
  3. When multiple names are listed on an objection, identification of the lead objector must be provided as defined in 218.2. Verification of the identity of the lead objector must be provided upon request or the reviewing officer will designate a lead objector as provided for in 218.5(d);
  4. The name of the proposed action (project), the name and title of the responsible official, and the name of the national forest and/or ranger district on which the action will be implemented;
  5. A description of those aspects of the proposed action addressed by the objection, including specific issues related to the proposed action; if applicable, how the objector believes the environmental analysis or draft decision, specifically, violates the law, regulation or policy; suggested remedies that would resolve the objection; supporting reasons for the reviewing officer to consider; and
  6. A statement that demonstrates the connection between prior specific written comments on the particular proposed action and the content of the objection, unless the objection concerns an issue that arose after the designated opportunities for comment (see paragraph 218.8(c)).

Incorporation of documents by reference is permitted only as provided in 218.8(b). It is the objector’s responsibility to insure a timely filing of a written objection with the reviewing officer pursuant to 218.9. All objections are available for public inspection during and after the objection process.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.



To download all letters in the Reading Room, please click the Download All Letters button. For larger downloads, you will be prompted to enter your email address and a link to the download will be sent to you once the zip file has been generated.


First Name search tooltip Organization Name search tooltip
Last Name search tooltip Keyword search
 


Check All Download Checked Letters
Results Per Page:
 DownloadAuthor NameOrganization NameDate SubmittedSize

Objection ()

 Gierlach, Peter  08/25/2023168 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Jacobs, Sky  08/20/202378 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Valer Clark, Anna  08/17/2023217 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Notestine, Jim  08/12/2023126 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Taylor, Elizabeth  08/09/2023127 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Caldwell, Dennis  08/08/202361 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Welch, John Archaeology Southwest08/08/2023620 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Hanson, Jonathan  08/07/2023101 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Carl, Anne  08/07/202351 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Brown, Wynne  08/05/2023307 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 BUGBEE, CHRISTOPHER  07/17/2023342 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Brown, Wynne  07/17/202317 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Harwood, Amy  07/15/2023192 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Smith, Loren  07/14/2023111 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Roth, Barbara  07/13/2023157 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Sigler, Dirk  07/13/2023110 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Kelleher, Page  07/13/202345 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Bradley, Curt  07/11/2023138 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Vacariu, Kim  07/10/2023176 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Fortna, Benjamin  07/10/202391 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Magee, Greg  07/10/2023124 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)
 Sholl, Randy  06/10/20231 KB [id:5094]Objection () (Total Letters: 22)

Other (Comment Period)

 Marlatt, Steve  11/23/20201 KB [id:3664]Other (Comment Period) (Total Letters: 35)
 Brown, Wynne Chiricahua Regional Council11/23/202073 KB [id:3664]Other (Comment Period) (Total Letters: 35)
 HODGES, DAVID Natural Allies and Wild Arizona11/23/202078 KB [id:3664]Other (Comment Period) (Total Letters: 35)
Displaying items 1 - 25 of 61

Download Checked Letters





Disclaimer: Letters that may contain proprietary or sensitive resource information, or that may be otherwise sensitive, are automatically withheld from displaying in the reading room pending human review. Letters received, but not accessible here, will still be considered and included as part of the record for this project. Most flagged letters are cleared for posting within a few days of being received. Posting may also be delayed for comments not submitted via the web form (e.g., email, mail or fax).