Go back to main project page

Integrated Management of Target Shooting on the Pike National Forest #57807

(Formerly the AIMS of Target Shooting project) This project will establish an adaptive framework to manage the opportunities for and effects of target shooting (recreational sport shooting) on the Pike National Forest.

The Integrated Management of Target Shooting Project is subject to the project level pre-decisional administrative review, or the objection process, found at 36 CFR 218 Subparts A and B. In order to be eligible to submit an objection, the public should have provided timely specific written comments during any period designated for public comment.

Contents of an Objection

Incorporation of documents by reference in the objection is permitted only as provided for at 36 CFR 218.8(b). Minimum content requirements of an objection as identified in 36 CFR 218.8(d) include:

  • Objector’s name and address with a telephone number if available; with signature or other verification of authorship supplied upon request.
  • Identification of the lead objector when multiple names are listed, along with verification upon request.
  • Name of project, name and title of the responsible official, national forest/ranger district where project is located.
  • Sufficient narrative description of those aspects of the proposed project objected to, specific issues related to the project, how environmental law, regulation, or policy would be violated, and suggested remedies which would resolve the objection; and
  • A statement demonstrating the connection between prior specific written comments on this project and the content of the objection unless the objection issue arose after the designated opportunities for comment.

 

Filing an Objection

Objections must be postmarked (if sent via postal mail), faxed, or submitted electronically via the project webpage at (https://cara.fs2c.usda.gov/Public/CommentInput?project=57807), 45 days following publication of this legal notice. It is the responsibility of objectors to ensure their objection is received in a timely manner (36 CFR 218.9).

When multiple names are listed on an objection, identification of the lead objector as defined in§ 218.2. Verification of the identity of the lead objector must be provided upon request or the reviewing officer will designate a lead objector as provided in§ 218.5(d).

 

Objection Sample Template

Lead Objector: ______________________

Objections are limited to the scope of this particular project.

A. Description of those aspects of the proposed project addressed by the objection, including specific issues related to the proposed project:

B. How the objector believes the environmental analysis or draft decision specifically violates law, regulation, or policy:

C. Suggested remedies that would resolve the objection:

D. Supporting reasons for the reviewing officer to consider:

E. Unless the objection concerns an issue that arose after the designated opportunity(ies) for comment, provide a statement that demonstrates the connection between prior specific written comments on the particular proposed project and the content of this objection.

 

THANK YOU for your interest in the management of National Forest System lands!

 



To download all letters in the Reading Room, please click the Download All Letters button. For larger downloads, you will be prompted to enter your email address and a link to the download will be sent to you once the zip file has been generated.


First Name search tooltip Organization Name search tooltip
Last Name search tooltip Keyword search
 


Check All Download Checked Letters
Results Per Page:
 DownloadAuthor NameOrganization NameDate SubmittedSize

Scoping (Extended scoping)

 Reuter, Deborah  12/04/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Rawson, Gary  12/04/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Mitchell, Amy Park Counry Government12/04/202311.24 MB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Anon, Anon  12/04/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Kreb, Kim  12/03/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Chognard, Kathleen  12/03/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Martin, Thomas  12/02/20232 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Roloff, Michael  12/02/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 wharton, max  12/02/20233 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Reuter, Mark  12/01/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Forrest, Robert  12/01/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Day-Skowron, Rebecca  12/01/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Johnson, Jim  12/01/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Caddell, Tom  11/30/20232 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Wessels, Matt  11/30/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 D, W  11/30/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Smith, Webb  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Skowron, Bob  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Pugliano, Frank  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Scott, Bryan  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Boucher, Alex  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 John, Leslie  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Kipp, Matthew  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Waggener, Leslee  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
 Wilcox, Kaye  11/29/20231 KB [id:5496]Scoping (Extended scoping) (Total Letters: 132)
Displaying items 226 - 250 of 796

Download Checked Letters





Disclaimer: Letters that may contain proprietary or sensitive resource information, or that may be otherwise sensitive, are automatically withheld from displaying in the reading room pending human review. Letters received, but not accessible here, will still be considered and included as part of the record for this project. Most flagged letters are cleared for posting within a few days of being received. Posting may also be delayed for comments not submitted via the web form (e.g., email, mail or fax).