Opportunity to Object to the Gardner Allotment Analysis Project Environmental Assessment (EA)
The Nogales Ranger District, Coronado National Forest, has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Draft Decision Notice for the Gardner Allotment Analysis project. The proposed action is to continue to authorize grazing on the allotments under updated terms and conditions, consistent with the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, in a manner that maintains or improves natural resource conditions. The project is implementing a land management plan not authorized under HFRA, and subject to the objection process pursuant to 36 CFR 218, Subparts A and B.
The FEA, FONSI, and Draft DN are available for review online at: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=26796. Questions about this project should be directed to Sean Lockwood at sean.lockwood@usda.gov.
How to file an Objection and Timeframe
Objections will only be accepted from those who have previously submitted specific written comments regarding the proposed action during scoping or other designated opportunity for public comment in accordance with 36 CFR 218.5(a). Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted, timely, and specific written comments regarding the proposed action unless based on new information arising after the designated comment opportunities.
Electronic objections in common (.doc, .pdf, .rtf, .txt) formats must be submitted to: objections-southwestern-Coronado@usda.gov with subject: “Gardner Allotment Analysis”. Objections, including attachments, may also be submitted via mail to the reviewing officer: OBJECTION: Gardner Allotment, Kurt Davis, Coronado National Forest Supervisor, 300 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701.
Objections must be submitted within 45 days following the publication of this legal notice in the Nogales International. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the time to file an objection. Those wishing to object should not rely upon dates or timeframe information provided by any other source. Regulations prohibit extending the time to file an objection.
At a minimum, an objection must include the following (36 CFR 218.8(d)):
1.) Objector’s name and address as defined in 218.2, with a telephone number, if available; 2.) Signature or other verification of authorship upon request (a scanned signature for electronic mail may be filed with the objection); 3.) When multiple names are listed on an objection, identification of the lead objector must be provided as defined in 218.2. Verification of the identity of the lead objector must be provided upon request or the reviewing officer will designate a lead objector as provided for in 218.5(d); 4.) The name of the proposed action (project), the name and title of the responsible official, and the name(s) of the national forest(s) and/or ranger district(s) on which the action will be implemented; 5.) A description of those aspects of the proposed action addressed by the objection, including specific issues related to the proposed action; if applicable, how the objector believes the environmental analysis or draft decision, specifically, violates the law, regulation or policy; suggested remedies that would resolve the objection; supporting reasons for the reviewing officer to consider; and 6.) A statement that demonstrates the connection between prior specific written comments on the particular proposed action and the content of the objection, unless the objection concerns an issue that arose after the designated opportunity(ies) for comment (see paragraph 218.8(c)).
Incorporation of documents by reference is permitted only as provided in 218.8(b). It is the objector’s responsibility to insure a timely filing of a written objection with the reviewing officer pursuant to 218.9. All objections are available for public inspection during and after the objection process.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Kurt Davis
